Fix censorship notice: no complainant shown in deletion, this is brute-force removal

- WeChat deletion notice shows NO complainant identity, NO specific violation, NO appeal
- This bypasses normal complaint procedure (which shows complainant + allows appeal)
- Corrected both ZH and EN descriptions to match actual screenshot evidence

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

index.html

@@ -527,16 +527,16 @@ body.lang-en .en { display: block; }
     <div style="background:rgba(255,0,0,.08);border:1px solid rgba(255,68,68,.4);border-radius:8px;padding:16px 18px;margin-bottom:16px;">
       <span class="zh" style="color:#ff8888;font-size:14px;line-height:2;">
         <strong style="color:#ff4444;">2026-03-15</strong> — 我们在微信公众号 <strong>AI-security-innora</strong> 发布的 <strong style="color:#fff;">4 篇安全研究文章全部被强制删除</strong>。<br>
-        删除理由：<strong>"违反《中华人民共和国网络安全法》"</strong>（接相关投诉）。<br>
+        删除通知仅写：<strong>"接相关投诉，违反《中华人民共和国网络安全法》"</strong>。<br>
-        投诉方：<strong>北京格韵律师事务所</strong>（代理厂商蚂蚁集团）。<br><br>
+        <strong style="color:#fff;">注意：删除通知中未显示任何投诉方信息、未列明具体违规条款、未提供申诉机会。</strong>这不是正常的投诉处理流程——正常流程会显示投诉方身份和具体主张并允许申诉。这是<strong style="color:#ff4444;">跳过正常程序的直接暴力删除</strong>。<br><br>
         这是厂商应对安全研究的第四层手段：<br>
         <span style="color:#ffaa44;">① 口头否认（3/10 "正常功能"）→ ② 律师函（3/11 发布4小时后）→ ③ 服务器端封堵 PoC（3/15 白名单拦截）→ ④ 平台审查删除所有文章（3/15）</span><br><br>
         <strong style="color:#fff;">本页面 (innora.ai/zfb/) 部署在中国境外服务器，不受微信平台审查影响。研究内容完整保留。</strong>
       </span>
       <span class="en" style="color:#ff8888;font-size:14px;line-height:2;">
         <strong style="color:#ff4444;">2026-03-15</strong> — All <strong style="color:#fff;">4 security research articles</strong> published on our WeChat Official Account <strong>AI-security-innora</strong> have been <strong style="color:#fff;">forcibly deleted</strong>.<br>
-        Reason given: <strong>"Violation of the Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China"</strong> (following a complaint).<br>
+        The only reason given: <strong>"Following a related complaint, violation of the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC."</strong><br>
-        Complainant: <strong>Beijing Geyun Law Firm</strong> (representing Ant Group).<br><br>
+        <strong style="color:#fff;">Note: The deletion notice identifies NO complainant, cites NO specific legal provision, and offers NO appeal process.</strong> This is NOT a normal complaint procedure — standard process shows the complainant's identity and specific claims, and allows appeal. This is a <strong style="color:#ff4444;">brute-force deletion bypassing normal procedures</strong>.<br><br>
         This represents the vendor's fourth layer of response to security research:<br>
         <span style="color:#ffaa44;">① Verbal denial (3/10 "normal functionality") → ② Lawyer's letter (3/11, 4hrs after disclosure) → ③ Server-side PoC blocking (3/15, whitelist filtering) → ④ Platform censorship of all articles (3/15)</span><br><br>
         <strong style="color:#fff;">This page (innora.ai/zfb/) is hosted outside mainland China and is not subject to WeChat censorship. All research content is preserved here.</strong>