diff --git a/index.html b/index.html index 135f589..b897d18 100644 --- a/index.html +++ b/index.html @@ -527,16 +527,16 @@ body.lang-en .en { display: block; }
2026-03-15 — 我们在微信公众号 AI-security-innora 发布的 4 篇安全研究文章全部被强制删除
- 删除理由:"违反《中华人民共和国网络安全法》"(接相关投诉)。
- 投诉方:北京格韵律师事务所(代理厂商蚂蚁集团)。

+ 删除通知仅写:"接相关投诉,违反《中华人民共和国网络安全法》"
+ 注意:删除通知中未显示任何投诉方信息、未列明具体违规条款、未提供申诉机会。这不是正常的投诉处理流程——正常流程会显示投诉方身份和具体主张并允许申诉。这是跳过正常程序的直接暴力删除

这是厂商应对安全研究的第四层手段:
① 口头否认(3/10 "正常功能")→ ② 律师函(3/11 发布4小时后)→ ③ 服务器端封堵 PoC(3/15 白名单拦截)→ ④ 平台审查删除所有文章(3/15)

本页面 (innora.ai/zfb/) 部署在中国境外服务器,不受微信平台审查影响。研究内容完整保留。
2026-03-15 — All 4 security research articles published on our WeChat Official Account AI-security-innora have been forcibly deleted.
- Reason given: "Violation of the Cybersecurity Law of the People's Republic of China" (following a complaint).
- Complainant: Beijing Geyun Law Firm (representing Ant Group).

+ The only reason given: "Following a related complaint, violation of the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC."
+ Note: The deletion notice identifies NO complainant, cites NO specific legal provision, and offers NO appeal process. This is NOT a normal complaint procedure — standard process shows the complainant's identity and specific claims, and allows appeal. This is a brute-force deletion bypassing normal procedures.

This represents the vendor's fourth layer of response to security research:
① Verbal denial (3/10 "normal functionality") → ② Lawyer's letter (3/11, 4hrs after disclosure) → ③ Server-side PoC blocking (3/15, whitelist filtering) → ④ Platform censorship of all articles (3/15)

This page (innora.ai/zfb/) is hosted outside mainland China and is not subject to WeChat censorship. All research content is preserved here.