CI: build and publish the container image to GHCR

The Dockerfile's builder stage already runs the unit suite, so the workflow
deliberately has no separate test job -- a red test cannot produce an image.

After pushing, the published artifact is smoke-tested by digest: `--version`
covers a runtime stage missing a shared library, and `--check` against a
throwaway credentials file covers the config baked into the image. Both were
failure modes a green build would not have caught. The `--check` invocation is
verified locally against docker/openvpngate.conf.

`latest` follows the newest v* tag rather than the branch head; master head is
published as `master`. Registry paths are lowercased explicitly rather than
relying on metadata-action, since the same value is reused for the smoke test.

GHCR_TOKEN / GHCR_USER / GHCR_IMAGE override the built-ins so this still works
from a mirror or a Gitea/Forgejo runner, where the ambient token authenticates
to the wrong registry. On github.com none of them need to be set.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
iceBear67
2026-07-28 06:04:51 +00:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent f37cd0a125
commit 40b47a8f66
5 changed files with 220 additions and 2 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ SOCKS5 客户端 ──► socks5::Server ──► egress::Egress ──► lwI
| [docs/FEASIBILITY.md](docs/FEASIBILITY.md) | 动手前的可行性结论。**需求中唯一不可能的部分在 §1**;UDP ASSOCIATE 的明确表态在 §5;1000 并发的真实天花板在 §4 |
| [docs/ARCHITECTURE.md](docs/ARCHITECTURE.md) | 模块边界、线程模型、切换状态机、选点与健康检查的具体算法 |
| [etc/openvpngate.conf](etc/openvpngate.conf) | 全部配置项,每一项都带默认值和「为什么是这个默认值」 |
| [docs/DOCKER.md](docs/DOCKER.md) | 容器部署。**容器里有三处宿主机默认值是错的**(§3);`cap_drop: ALL` 为什么能成立(§5 |
| [docs/DOCKER.md](docs/DOCKER.md) | 容器部署。**容器里有三处宿主机默认值是错的**(§3);`cap_drop: ALL` 为什么能成立(§5GHCR 发布与 CI(§9 |
---