From 61b85c22efd57a7ccaed92c887afe6cec3eb564e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: feng Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 07:29:12 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?update:=20Wave=203=20deletion=20=E2=80=94=209th?= =?UTF-8?q?=20article=20deleted=20citing=20Cybersecurity=20Law?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - article_censorship.html: 8→9 articles, 2→3 waves - Added Wave 3 timeline entry: Vol.04 PatchProxy deleted 2026-03-25 - Key contradiction: CAC Data Bureau confirmed Alipay investigation on SAME DAY - Added deletion notice screenshot (evidence/wechat_wave3_deletion.png) Co-Authored-By: Claude --- article_censorship.html | 25 +++++++++++++++++-------- evidence/wechat_wave3_deletion.png | Bin 0 -> 305565 bytes 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) create mode 100644 evidence/wechat_wave3_deletion.png diff --git a/article_censorship.html b/article_censorship.html index 45aa649..f41938b 100644 --- a/article_censorship.html +++ b/article_censorship.html @@ -4,12 +4,12 @@ 当"网络安全法"成为审查武器 | When "Cybersecurity Law" Becomes a Censorship Weapon — Innora AI Security Research - + - + @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ - + @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ footer a { color: var(--teal); } "@context": "https://schema.org", "@type": "Article", "headline": "When 'Cybersecurity Law' Becomes a Censorship Weapon: A Security Researcher's Global Fight Against Corporate Suppression", - "description": "8 WeChat articles force-deleted in 2 waves. 36 reports filed with MITRE. IACR paper published. 22 countries investigating. Full timeline and evidence.", + "description": "9 WeChat articles force-deleted in 3 waves. 36 reports filed with MITRE. IACR paper published. 22 countries investigating. Full timeline and evidence.", "datePublished": "2026-03-15", "author": {"@type": "Person", "name": "Jiqiang Feng (风宁)", "email": "feng@innora.ai"}, "publisher": {"@type": "Organization", "name": "Innora AI Security Research", "url": "https://innora.ai"}, @@ -710,8 +710,8 @@ footer a { color: var(--teal); }

- 8篇微信安全研究文章被分两波强制删除。36份报告已提交MITRE。IACR学术论文已收录。22个国家的监管机构正在调查。真相不需要删除通知。 - 8 WeChat security research articles forcibly deleted in 2 waves. 36 reports filed with MITRE. IACR paper published. 22 countries investigating. Truth needs no takedown notice. + 9篇微信安全研究文章被分三波删除。36份报告已提交MITRE。IACR学术论文已收录。22个国家的监管机构正在调查。真相不需要删除通知。 + 9 WeChat security research articles deleted in 3 waves. 36 reports filed with MITRE. IACR paper published. 22 countries investigating. Truth needs no takedown notice.

@@ -1106,10 +1106,19 @@ footer a { color: var(--teal); } The escalation pattern is unmistakable:

- 口头否认漏洞 → 律师函投诉"名誉侵权"（被驳回）→ 改用"网络安全法"（第一波：删4篇）→ 研究员继续发表 → 再次删除（第二波：再删4篇）→ 服务器端拦截PoC - Verbal denial → Lawyer letter citing "reputation infringement" (rejected) → Switch to "Cybersecurity Law" (Wave 1: 4 articles deleted) → Researcher continues publishing → Second deletion (Wave 2: 4 more deleted) → Server-side PoC interception + 口头否认漏洞 → 律师函投诉"名誉侵权"（被驳回）→ 改用"网络安全法"（第一波：删4篇）→ 研究员继续发表 → 再次删除（第二波：再删4篇）→ 网信办核查同日再删1篇（第三波）→ 服务器端拦截PoC + Verbal denial → Lawyer letter citing "reputation infringement" (rejected) → Switch to "Cybersecurity Law" (Wave 1: 4 articles deleted) → Researcher continues publishing → Second deletion (Wave 2: 4 more deleted) → CAC investigation same day, 1 more deleted (Wave 3) → Server-side PoC interception

+ +
+
2026-03-25
+

+ 第三波：网信办核查同日删除 — Vol.04《支付宝146,173个方法可被远程替换——PatchProxy热修复的代码级铁证》被删除。删除理由明确引用"违反《中华人民共和国网络安全法》"。同一天(3月25日)，中国网信办数据局正式通知研究员，正在组织对支付宝App进行核查。揭露支付宝安全问题的文章被以"网络安全法"名义删除，与网络安全最高执法机构的调查行动形成直接矛盾。 + Wave 3: Deletion on Same Day as CAC Investigation — Vol.04 "Alipay's 146,173 Remotely Replaceable Methods — PatchProxy Hot-Patching" was deleted. The deletion notice explicitly cited "violation of the Cybersecurity Law of the PRC." On the same day (March 25), China's CAC Data Bureau formally notified the researcher that it was conducting an investigation into Alipay's data practices. An article exposing Alipay's security issues was deleted under "Cybersecurity Law" while the nation's top cybersecurity enforcement agency was simultaneously investigating the same company. +

+
+